Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae XopQ protein suppresses rice immune responses through interaction with two 14‐3‐3 proteins but its phospho‐null mutant induces rice immune responses and interacts with another 14‐3‐3 protein

Summary Many bacterial phytopathogens employ effectors secreted through the type‐III secretion system to suppress plant innate immune responses. The Xanthomonas type‐III secreted non‐TAL effector protein Xanthomonas outer protein Q (XopQ) exhibits homology to nucleoside hydrolases. Previous work indicated that mutations which affect the biochemical activity of XopQ fail to affect its ability to suppress rice innate immune responses, suggesting that the effector might be acting through some other pathway or mechanism. In this study, we show that XopQ interacts in yeast and in planta with two rice 14‐3‐3 proteins, Gf14f and Gf14g. A serine to alanine mutation (S65A) of a 14‐3‐3 interaction motif in XopQ abolishes the ability of XopQ to interact with the two 14‐3‐3 proteins and to suppress innate immunity. Surprisingly, the S65A mutant gains the ability to interact with a third 14‐3‐3 protein that is a negative regulator of innate immunity. The XopQS65A mutant is an inducer of rice immune responses and this property is dominant over the wild‐type function of XopQ. Taken together, these results suggest that XopQ targets the rice 14‐3‐3 mediated immune response pathway and that its differential phosphorylation might enable interaction with alternative 14‐3‐3 proteins.


I N T RO D U C T I O N
Plants can perceive pathogens by recognition of conserved molecular signatures of microorganisms, which are called as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (or PAMPs, e.g. lipopolysaccharide or LPS) (Buttner and Bonas, 2010;Keshavarzi et al., 2004) or the products released on cell/tissue damage, which are known as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) (Bergey and Ryan, 1999;Jha et al., 2007;Smith, 2001). Initial perception of pathogens involves recognition by receptors at the cell surface (Zipfel, 2008) and a subsequent signal cascade via protein kinase complexes (Lin et al., 2014;Lu et al., 2010). This results in activation of the expression of defence genes, leading to elaboration of defence responses (Felix et al., 1999;Zipfel, 2008;Zipfel and Rathjen, 2008). These responses, which help plants counter a broad range of pathogens, are referred to as PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI).
In order to counteract plant defence responses, many Gram-negative phytopathogenic bacteria use effectors secreted through the type-III secretion system (T3SS) to suppress PTI, helping in the establishment of the bacterium in the plant (Akimoto-Tomiyama et al., 2012;Hauck et al., 2003;Jones and Dangl, 2006). Plants have in turn evolved resistance or 'R' genes which recognize either the effectors or the consequence of the action of effectors to trigger another layer of the plant immune responses that is referred to as effector-triggered immunity (ETI). An additional layer is added to plant-pathogen interactions by the observation that some effectors secreted through the bacterial T3SS are able to suppress ETI.
How do effectors suppress plant innate immunity? These effectors have domains with functions similar to enzymes like phosphatases, kinases and acetyltransferases (Grant et al., 2006;Kay and Bonas, 2009;Mudgett, 2005). Previous studies highlighted examples of pathways which are hijacked by type-III effectors, e.g. the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway by XopAU (Teper et al., 2018) or the proteasomal pathway by the interaction of the type-III effector XopP with the E3 ubiquitin ligase PUB44 (Ishikawa et al., 2014). The 14-3-3 proteins are a class of eukaryotic proteins that play important roles in signal transduction cascades by binding to phosphor-serine/threonine-containing motifs in target proteins (Cotelle and Leonhardt, 2015). An increasing amount of evidence indicates that 14-3-3 proteins play important roles in regulating PTI and ETI (Lozano-Duran and Robatzek, 2015). The 14-3-3 protein binding motif is conserved in a large number of bacterial effectors (Giska et al., 2013) and they have been shown to interact with plant 14-3-3 proteins. The Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria (Xcv) XopN effector modulates plant defence responses by interaction with 14-3-3 scaffold proteins (Taylor et al., 2012). The type-III effector from Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria XopQ as well as its Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola homolog HopQ1 have the 14-3-3 protein-binding motif (Giska et al., 2013). HopQ1 interacts with the tomato 14-3-3 proteins TFT1 and TFT5, apparently in a phosphorylation-dependent manner (Dubrow et al., 2018;Li et al., 2013). XopQ from Xcv has also been shown to function in the suppression of ETI by interaction with the tomato 14-3-3 protein TFT4 (Teper et al., 2014).
Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae is a Gram-negative bacterium that causes bacterial blight, a serious disease of rice. Initial screening of a number of T3SS secreted effectors of X. oryzae pv. oryzae identified four secreted proteins, Xanthomonas outer protein N (XopN), XopQ, XopX and XopZ, as suppressors of cell wall damage induced innate immune responses in rice (Sinha et al., 2013). Among these four proteins, only XopQ protein had a predicted biochemical activity. XopQ is highly conserved in Xanthomonads (Hajri et al., 2009;Jalan et al., 2013;Moreira et al., 2010;Potnis et al., 2011). Mutations in the XopQ protein that reduce biochemical activity did not seem to affect the ability of the protein to suppress rice innate immunity (Gupta et al., 2015). The other structural feature of the XopQ protein is the presence of the 14-3-3 protein binding motif (Dubrow et al., 2018;Giska et al., 2013). Analysis of the amino acid sequence of X. oryzae pv. oryzae XopQ indicated the presence of two putative 14-3-3 binding motifs at amino acid residues 62-67 (RTQSLP) and [219][220][221][222][223][224]. In this study, we explored the role of the 14-3-3 protein binding motifs of XopQ in the suppression of rice innate immune responses. The results suggest that X. oryzae pv. oryzae XopQ can interact with several rice 14-3-3 proteins and that this interaction is important for the ability of the protein to modulate rice innate immunity.

R E S U LT S
The X. oryzae pv. oryzae XopQ protein interacts with two rice 14-3-3 proteins Rice has eight 14-3-3 isoforms, namely, Gf14a, Gf14b, Gf14c, Gf14d, Gf14e, Gf14f, Gf14g and Gf14h. Since XopQ has two putative 14-3-3 protein binding motifs, we used the GAL-4 based yeast two-hybrid assay to test whether the XopQ protein can interact with rice 14-3-3 proteins. The XopQ protein was tagged with the DNA-binding domain (BD) of the pDEST32 vector (Invitrogen) as bait, creating the fusion protein BD::XopQ, and each of the eight rice 14-3-3 proteins were tagged with the activation domain (AD) of the pDEST22 vector (Invitrogen), creating the AD::14-3-3 fusion proteins as prey. Transformation in the yeast strain pJ694A (James et al., 1996) and subsequent selection on growth medium lacking adenine and histidine (reporter auxotrophic markers), leucine and tryptophan (vector selection markers) and containing 1,2,4-triazole (3-AT, a competitive inhibitor of HIS3 biosynthesis) showed a strong interaction of the XopQ protein with the 14-3-3 proteins Gf14f and Gf14g (Fig. 1A). Expression of the remaining six rice 14-3-3 proteins in yeast was confirmed by western blotting, indicating that absence of interaction is not due to lack of expression ( Supplementary Fig. S1).
In order to confirm this interaction in planta, we performed a bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assay, with binary BiFC-Gateway destination vectors (Gehl et al., 2009). For this, the coding sequence of XopQ was cloned as a fusion protein with the C-terminus of the Venus fluorescent protein (VFP) and the 14-3-3 genes Gf14f and Gf14g were cloned as fusion proteins with the N-terminus of the VFP protein to yield the cVFP-XopQ, nVFP-Gf14g and nVFP-Gf14f clones, respectively (Supplementary Table S1). The Agrobacterium strain AGL1 containing the independent expression constructs were hand-infiltrated into Nicotiana benthamiana leaves for ectopic expression. On visualisation at 48 h post infiltration (hpi), the fluorescent protein signal was detected in the cytoplasm of the N. benthamiana cells in the interaction of XopQ wild-type (WT) with Gf14g and Gf14f (Fig. 1B), which indicated that, in planta, these two proteins interact with the XopQ protein.
of the serine-65 residue at the 14-3-3 protein binding motif is important.
The serine-65 containing 14-3-3 protein binding motif of XopQ is essential for suppression of rice immune responses Previously our group has shown that in rice XopQ suppresses cell wall damage induced innate immune responses such as callose deposition and defence response associated programmed cell death (DRA-PCD) (Sinha et al., 2013). A positive reaction in the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling assay and inhibition by the baculoviral anti-apoptotic protein p35 are hallmarks of PCD in rice (Hoang et al., 2015). Similar results have been obtained by us for the DRA-PCD seen in rice roots on treatment with cell wall degrading enzymes (unpublished observations). Hence, the effect of mutations in the 14-3-3 protein binding motif-1 of XopQ (xopQS65A and xopQS65D) and motif-2 (xopQT222A) in suppression of rice immune responses was assessed. A xopN xopQ xopX xopZ quadruple mutant (hereafter referred to as QM) is an inducer of host innate immune responses as it produces the elicitors of host innate immunity but is unable to suppress them (Sinha et al., 2013). XopQ or its mutants were independently introduced into an X. oryzae pv. oryzae QM through the broad host range vector pHM1 and the resulting strains were assessed for their ability to suppress host immune responses. Introduction of the WT XopQ protein into the QM confers on it the ability to suppress callose deposition, a host innate immune response ( Fig. 3A, B) (Gupta et al., 2015). In contrast, the XopQS65A mutant is unable to suppress callose deposition when introduced into the QM strain ( Fig. 3A, B). This indicates that the serine residue at the 65th position in the XopQ protein is important for the suppression of an immune response in rice. The phosphomimic mutant XopQS65D suppressed callose deposition as effectively as the XopQWT protein, indicating that phosphorylation of the serine-65 residue is important for suppression of rice innate immune responses. The XopQT222A mutant suppresses callose deposition as well as the WT XopQ protein, indicating that this residue does not have a role in suppression of rice immune responses. Expression of the XopQ and XopQ mutant proteins in planta following Xanthomonas infection (Supplementary Fig. S2) was assessed by western blotting. Treatment of rice roots with the QM induces plant DRA-PCD. Treatment of rice roots with a QM strain carrying XopQ suppresses DRA-PCD induced by the QM. However, treatment of rice roots with the QM strain carrying XopQS65A fails to suppress DRA-PCD induced by QM (Fig. 3C). This indicates that mutation of the 14-3-3 binding motif of XopQ results in loss of the ability to suppress rice immune response associated PCD. Again, the XopQS65D phosphomimic mutant is able to suppress DRA-PCD induced by QM. The XopQT222A mutant is as effective as the WT XopQ protein in suppressing DRA-PCD induced by QM (Fig. 3C).
Overall, these results suggest that the serine-65 containing 14-3-3 binding motif of XopQ but not the threonine-222 containing 14-3-3 binding motif is required for suppression of rice innate immune responses and that phosphorylation of S65 appears to be required for this activity.
Mutation of the serine-65 containing motif-1 14-3-3 protein binding motif of XopQ affects subcellular localization of the protein 14-3-3 proteins are known to affect the biological function of their client proteins by alteration of their subcellular localization (Cotelle et al., 2000;Paul et al., 2012;Taoka et al., 2011). Bioinformatic analysis of the XopQ sequence revealed a putative bipartite nuclear localization signal (NLS) using the NLS mapper tool (Kosugi et al., 2009). Prediction of putative localization of XopQ was also done using the software TargetP, which gave an intermediate score (Nielsen et al., 1997). The score indicated that this protein could putatively be localized to both the nucleus as well as the cytoplasm. In order to determine where X. oryzae pv. oryzae XopQ protein would localize, and whether mutation in the 14-3-3 protein binding motifs would change its localization, the XopQWT, xopQS65A, xopQS65D and xopQT222A mutants were cloned using the Gateway system into the pH7WGF2 binary vector containing the N-terminal GFP tag (Karimi et al., 2002) and transiently expressed in onion epidermal peels via agrobacterial delivery. Subcellular localization was checked by epifluorescence microscopy 48 h after co-cultivation with Agrobacterium. DAPI staining was done to visualize the nucleus. The resulting eGFP::XopQWT fusion protein localized to both the nucleus and cytoplasm in onion epidermal cells (Fig. 4). This is in agreement with a previous report of GFP-HopQ1 localization to the nucleus and cytoplasm (Kim et al., 2009). However, the eGFP::XopQS65A mutant localized only in the nucleus as no signal could be seen in the cytoplasm (Fig. 4). On the other hand, the eGFP::XopQS65D mutant localizes mostly in the cytoplasm. The eGFP::XopQT222A also localized mostly in the cytoplasm. These results suggest that phosphorylation of S65 is required for localization of the XopQ protein in the cytoplasm.

The XopQS65A mutant induces rice immune responses in a dominant manner over the WT protein
Our observations suggested that the XopQS65A mutant showed high levels of immune markers (callose/DRA-PCD) in the QM background. This could be due to its inability to suppress the QM-induced immune responses, or due to the ability of the XopQS65A mutant itself to upregulate the immune responses. In order to test this possibility, 4-day-old rice seedlings were treated with Agrobacterium strain AGL1 containing the eGFP::XopQ or eGFP::XopQS65A fusion proteins and these roots were stained with propidium iodide (PI). Interestingly, treatment with the agrobacterial strain containing the eGFP::XopQS65A construct resulted in extensive internalization of PI as compared to eGFP::XopQ, suggesting that eGFP::XopQS65A is inducing a DRA-PCD (Fig. 5A). Transient overexpression of XopQS65D or XopQT222A did not result in induction of DRA-PCD. Similar results were obtained in a callose deposition assay wherein the xopQS65A mutant induces callose deposition significantly more than xopQWT, xopQS65D or xopQT222A ( Fig. 5B and C). Also, prior treatment of rice leaves with agrobacterial strains carrying xopQS65A, but not those carrying xopQ, xopQS65D or xopQT222A, results in reduced lesion length on subsequent infection with X. oryzae pv. oryzae (Fig. 5D).
of rice roots with the BXO43/pHM1::xopQS65A strain resulted in increased induction of DRA-PCD as compared to treatment with BXO43 containing either empty vector pHM1 or pHM1::xopQWT (Fig. 5E). Callose deposition induced by the pHM1::xopQS65A mutant was also higher as compared to either pHM1 or pHM1::x-opQWT (Fig. 5F,G). This suggests that the XopQS65A protein function is dominant over the WT XopQ function.
XopQS65A mutant shows enhanced interaction with a novel 14-3-3 protein Gf14e In order to explain how the XopQS65A mutant might be inducing rice innate immune responses, we hypothesised that the XopQS65A mutant might be interacting with a novel rice protein. For this, the ability of the XopQS65A mutant protein to interact with the eight rice 14-3-3 proteins was tested in a yeast two-hybrid assay. Interestingly, in the yeast two-hybrid assay, the XopQS65A mutant showed enhanced interaction with a different 14-3-3 protein, Gf14e, with which the XopQWT protein showed negligible interaction (Fig. 6A). XopQT222A showed a weak interaction with Gf14e similar to the interaction of WT XopQ with Gf14e (Fig. 6A). The XopQS65D and XopQT222D mutants failed to interact with the Gf14e protein, suggesting that constitutive phosphorylation at either one of the 14-3-3 protein-binding motifs could be inhibiting interaction with this 14-3-3 protein. Also, the XopQS65A-T222A mutant failed to interact with Gf14e, indicating that a functional 14-3-3 proteinbinding motif is required for this interaction. The results from the yeast two-hybrid assay were also confirmed in an in planta BiFC assay (Fig. 6B).

D I SC U SS I O N
The X. oryzae pv. oryzae type-III effector XopQ is involved in suppression of rice immune responses. Since the biochemical activity of XopQ was shown not to be required for the suppression of rice immune responses, we hypothesized that it might be accomplishing this function by interaction with rice 14-3-3 proteins. XopQ has two 14-3-3 protein binding motifs, both of which are of the Mode-I type, with Arg at position -3 (with respect to the phosphorylated residue) and proline at position + 2 (Muslin et al., 1996;Yaffe et al., 1997). In this study, we have studied the role of these 14-3-3 protein binding motifs of X. oryzae pv. oryzae XopQ in the modulation of rice immune responses. Our results show that abolishing the phosphorylation site by the serine-65A mutation in the motif-1 14-3-3 protein binding motifs of XopQ affects the following: (1) the ability of the protein to suppress rice immune responses, (2) the ability of the protein to interact with the rice 14-3-3 proteins Gf14f and Gf14g, and (3) the subcellular localization of the XopQ protein. A phosphomimic S65D mutant of XopQ is able to suppress rice immune responses, suggesting that phosphorylation of serine-65 may be necessary for the ability of the XopQ protein to suppress host immunity. It is known that 14-3-3 proteins mostly interact with the consensus binding site in their client proteins when the motif is phosphorylated at the conserved serine/threonine (Cotelle and Leonhardt, 2015).
Earlier reports have highlighted the interaction of bacterial type-III effectors with plant 14-3-3 proteins during the infection process. For example, interaction of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria XopN with the tomato 14-3-3 TFT1 has been shown to be required for suppression of PTI (Taylor et al., 2012). Also, the association of P. syringae HopQ1 with 14-3-3 proteins from tomato and Nicotiana benthamiana was shown to be phosphorylation dependent and was responsible for the modulation of HopQ1 subcellular localization and stability in planta (Giska et al., 2013;Li et al., 2013). Our results indicate that phosphorylation of the 14-3-3 protein binding motif affected the interaction of the XopQ protein with the host 14-3-3 proteins Gf14f and Gf14g, and its ability to suppress the rice innate immune responses as XopQS65A fails to interact with the cognate rice 14-3-3 proteins.
Next, we asked whether mutations in the XopQ 14-3-3 protein binding motif would affect its subcellular localization. Earlier studies on the Pseudomonas effector protein HopQ1 indicated that it localizes in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm while an S51A mutation in the 14-3-3 binding site of this protein results in enrichment within the nucleus (Giska et al., 2013). Our study also shows that the XopQS65A mutation results in a nuclear localization. This may be because of the inability of the XopQS65A mutant protein to interact with the 14-3-3 proteins Gf14f and Gf14g as earlier reports have suggested a role for 14-3-3 proteins in determining the subcellular localization of client proteins.
What might be the functional significance of the interaction of XopQ protein with Gf14f and Gf14g? It is possible that Gf14f and Gf14g might be involved in the signal transduction pathways that leads to elaboration of innate immunity and that XopQ is able to suppress innate immunity by interaction with these proteins. During this study, we also observed that transient expression of the XopQS65A mutant protein resulted in induction of defence responses such as callose deposition and DRA-PCD in rice. Transient expression of XopQS65A protein also resulted in enhanced tolerance against subsequent X. oryzae pv. oryzae infection. Unlike the WT XopQ protein, the XopQS65A protein exhibits strong interaction with the rice 14-3-3 protein Gf14e. This protein has earlier been shown to be a negative regulator of rice innate immune responses as a knockdown line shows HR mimic lesions (Manosalva et al., 2011). This raises the possibility that the ability of XopQS65A to induce immune rice responses is due to its ability to interact with Gf14e. Also, the inability of the XopQS65A-T222A double mutant to interact with Gf14e suggests that the XopQS65A protein interacts with the latter protein via the 14-3-3 binding motif that encompasses T222. The inability of XopQS65D to interact with Gf14e suggests that phosphorylation at serine-65 might be hindering interaction with Gf14e via threonine-222 in the other motif. This might ensure that the binding of Gf14f and Gf14g at serine-65 and of Gf14e do not occur at the same time. It is to be noted that the XopQT222A protein as well as XopQWT exhibit a minimal amount of interaction with Gf14e, suggesting that a basal level of interaction may be taking place via the serine-65 containing motif. However, this level of interaction appears to be insufficient for the induction of rice immune responses.
What might be the significance in the observation that XopQ protein and XopQS65A interact with different 14-3-3 proteins? It is possible that the interaction of XopQS65A with Gf14e, a negative regulator of innate immunity, is an artifactual situation and that XopQ never interacts with this protein during infection. However, if XopQ can exist as a non-phosphorylated form and interact with Gf14e, it can provide X. oryzae pv. oryzae with the ability to suppress as well as induce rice defence responses (including programmed cell death responses) during infection. This may be advantageous to X. oryzae pv. oryzae as it is considered to be a hemi-biotroph which acts as a biotroph at early stages of infection and as a necrotroph at later stages of infection. The plant immune response pathways which the XopQ protein hijacks to accomplish its role during infection, its in planta phosphorylation status, and the rice proteins with which it might interact during infection remain to be explored.

Molecular biology and microbiology techniques
For the amplification and cloning of the WT copy of the xopQ gene and the respective 14-3-3 protein binding motif mutants as well as the rice 14-3-3 genes (Locus ID in Supplementary Table S2), high-fidelity Phusion polymerase (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) was used. The genes were cloned into pENTR/D-TOPO (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) and further by Gateway LR reaction (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) into Gateway compatible vectors. Taq polymerase from KAPA Biosystems (Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA) was used for all screening purposes. For cloning in the pHM1 vector, the primers as listed in Supplementary Table S3 were used for amplification of the xopQ gene or its 14-3-3 protein binding mutants using Phusion polymerase (Finnzymes). Restriction digestions were carried out using Thermo Fischer Scientific Fast Digest enzymes. Ligation reactions for cloning in pHM1 were carried out using T4 DNA ligase (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). Plasmids were purified using the alkaline lysis method. Gel extraction were carried out using a Macherey Nagel gel extraction kit. Agarose gel electrophoresis, transformation of E. coli and electroporation of plasmids into X. oryzae pv. oryzae were performed as described previously (Ray et al., 2000;Subramoni and Sonti, 2005). All cloned vectors were confirmed by sequencing (ABI Prism 3700 automated DNA sequencer). The obtained sequences were subjected to homology searches using the BLAST algorithm in the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (Altschul et al., 1990).

Yeast two-hybrid assays
The WT copy of XopQ, its respective 14-3-3 protein binding motif mutants and the eight rice 14-3-3 genes were cloned in the yeast two-hybrid vectors pDEST32 and pDEST22 (Invitrogen) using the Gateway cloning system (Invitrogen). These plasmids were transformed into Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain pJ694a (James et al., 1996). Yeast transformation was done as described (Gietz and Schiestl, 2007). Cells were plated on SD−LEU−TRP and grown at 30 °C to select for transformants. Colonies were scraped from plates, patched and grown overnight in SD−LEU−TRP liquid medium at 30 °C with shaking. The OD 600 of saturated cultures was adjusted to 1.0 and serial dilutions were made and spotted on SD−LEU−TRP (selection for vector) and SD−LEU−TRP−ADE−HIS (selection for interaction) + 1 mM 3-amino trizol (3-AT; inhibitor of histidine biosynthesis) plates to identify rice 14-3-3 clones that interact with XopQ. The experiments were repeated three times.

Yeast protein extraction
Protein extraction from yeast was done as described earlier (Taylor et al., 2012). Briefly, yeast cells were resuspended in lysis buffer (1.85 M NaOH and 7% 2-mercaptoethanol), lysed by vortexing with 0.5 mm glass beads and then proteins were precipitated in 10% trichloroacetic acid. Protein pellets after centrifugation were washed with 1 M Tris, pH 6.8 and then resuspended in Laemmli sample buffer. Equal amounts of isolated protein supernatants were further used for sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blotting.

Bimolecular fluorescence complementation
The WT copy of xopQ, its respective 14-3-3 protein binding motif mutants and the eight rice 14-3-3 genes were cloned by Gateway cloning (Invitrogen) in the BIMOLECULAR FLUORESCENCE COMPLEMENTATION (BiFC) vectors pDEST-VYNE(R)GW and pDEST-VYCE(R)GW (Gehl et al., 2009)  Germany) using 20× objectives and an He-Ne laser at 488 nm excitation. Images were analysed using ZEN software. Five fields were imaged for each construct per experiment. Each set was repeated three times.

Callose deposition in rice
Callose deposition assays were done as described earlier (Adam and Somerville, 1996;Hauck et al., 2003;Sinha et al., 2013;Tayi et al., 2018). X. oryzae pv. oryzae strains were grown to saturation, OD 600 adjusted to 1.0 using Milli-Q water and infiltrated with a needleless 1 mL syringe into leaves of 14-day-old rice plants. 16 h after infiltration, the leaves were cut and placed in absolute alcohol at 65 °C to remove chlorophyll. This was followed by treatment with 70% ethanol at 65 °C and further by MQ water for rehydration. Subsequently, the samples were stained with 0.5% aniline blue solution prepared in 150 mM K 2 HPO 4 , pH 9.5. The leaves were then washed with MQ water and observed under an epifluorescence microscope (Nikon, Minato, Tokyo, Japan) using a blue filter (excitation wavelength of 365 nm) and 10× objective. Five leaves were imaged for each construct per experiment. Each set was repeated three times.

Defence response associated programmed cell death assay
Assays for DRA-PCD in rice roots were performed as described earlier (Sinha et al., 2013;Tayi et al., 2018). TN-1 rice seeds were surface sterilized and germinated on 0.5% sterile agar for 3 days. Root tips 1 cm in length were cut from the seedlings and treated with X. oryzae pv. oryzae strains containing either XopQWT or its 14-3-3 binding mutants. After incubation for 16 h, roots were washed and stained with PI. The samples were visualized under a LSM-510 Meta confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss) using 63× oil immersion objectives and an He-Ne laser at 543 nm excitation to detect PI internalization. Images were analysed using LSM software. Five roots were imaged for each construct per experiment. Each set was repeated three times.
X. oryzae pv. oryzae infection of rice As described earlier (Pillai et al., 2018), cultures of Agrobacterium strain AGL1 expressing an N-terminal eGFP fusion to XopQWT or its 14-3-3 binding mutants were injected in the midveins of leaves of 40-day-old TN-1 rice plants. At 12 h post injection, the leaves were infected with the WT X. oryzae pv. oryzae strain BXO43 by the pin-prick method 1 cm above the point of injection. Progression of disease lesions was scored 14 days post infection. Five leaves were imaged for each construct per experiment. Each set was repeated three times.

Protein expression for localization in onion epidermal peels
Healthy onion scales (1 × 1 cm) were placed on a plate in such a way that their inner surfaces were immersed in Agrobacterium AGL1 containing eGFP::XopQWT or its 14-3-3 binding mutants (OD 600 = 1-1.5) resuspended in a solution consisting of 5% (g/v) sucrose, 100 mg acetosyringone/L and 0.02% (v/v) Silwet-77 for 12 h at 28 °C. Then the onion scales were transferred to plates of 1/2 MS (Murashige and Skoog salts, 30 g sucrose/L and 0.7% (g/v) agar, pH 5.7) and co-cultivated with Agrobacterium for 2 days. Fluorescence was visualized under an epifluorescence microscope (Nikon) at 488 nm excitation and 10× objective. Each set was repeated three times.

SU PP O R T I N G I N F O R M AT I O N
Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of this article at the publisher's web site:

Fig. S1
Expression of six rice 14-3-3 proteins in the yeast strain pJ694a following expression from yeast two-hybrid vector pDEST22. Yeast two-hybrid reporter strain pJ694a was transformed with the pDEST22 vector containing the respective rice 14-3-3 proteins. Transformants were selected on SD (−trp) dropout medium. Total cellular protein was isolated and checked for expression by western blotting. Expression of activation domain (AD) tagged proteins was detected by western blot using anti:AD antibody (Clontech GAL4 AD monoclonal antibody; 630402) raised in mouse. The secondary antibody of ALP conjugated to anti-mouse IgG was used for detecting AD fusion protein expression (upper panel). Coomassie staining of the gel shows equal loading of protein in the different samples (lower panel).

Fig. S2
Expression of xopQ gene of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae and its 14-3-3 protein-binding motif mutants from exudate of rice leaves following X. oryzae pv. oryzae infection. Leaves of 40-day-old rice seedlings of Taichung Native 1 rice variety were clip inoculated with the following X. oryzae pv. oryzae strains: XopQ-,XopQ-/pHM1, XopQ-/pHM1::XopQ, XopQ-/pHM1::XopQ S65A, XopQ-/pHM1::XopQ S65D and XopQ-/pHM1::XopQ T222A. Twelve days after inoculation, 3 cm leaf pieces from the inoculated end were cut and exudate was allowed to ooze out for 6 h at 4 °C. Expression of XopQWT and mutant proteins was detected by western blot analysis using anti:XopQ antibodies raised in rabbit. For immunoblotting using alkaline phosphatase (ALP), ALP conjugated to anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; A3687 1ML) secondary antibody was used. XopQ expression was detected at 50 kDa (upper panel). Expression of the type II secretion system secreted enzyme lipase A was assessed by western blotting to normalize for protein loading by using anti-lipase A antibody raised in rabbit (lower panel) and ALP based secondary antibody. Table S1 List of bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study (DOC). Table S2 Locus ID of the eight rice 14-3-3 genes (DOC). Table S3 List of oligonucleotide primers used in this study (DOC).